An nameless Substack publish revealed this week accuses compliance startup Delve of “falsely” convincing “tons of of consumers they have been compliant” with privateness and safety laws, probably exposing these clients to “felony legal responsibility beneath HIPAA and hefty fines beneath GDPR.”
Delve is a Y Combinator-backed startup that final yr introduced elevating a $32 million Sequence A at a $300 million valuation. (The spherical was led by Perception Companions.) On Friday, the startup tried to refute the accusations on its weblog, calling the Substack publish “deceptive” and saying it “accommodates quite a few inaccurate claims.”
The Substack publish is credited to “DeepDelver,” who described themselves as working at a (now former) Delve consumer.
DeepDelver recounted receiving an electronic mail in December claiming the startup had “leaked a spreadsheet with confidential consumer reviews.” Whereas Delve CEO Karun Kaushik apparently assured clients in a subsequent electronic mail that they have been in compliance and that no exterior celebration gained entry to delicate information, DeepDelver stated they and different clients had change into suspicious.
“Having the shared expertise of being underwhelmed with the Delve expertise, and having the general sense that one thing fishy was happening, we determined to pool assets and examine collectively,” they wrote.
Their conclusion? That Delve “achieves its declare of being the quickest platform by producing pretend proof, producing auditor conclusions on behalf of certification mills that rubber stamp reviews, and skipping main framework necessities whereas telling shoppers they’ve achieved 100% compliance.”
DeepDelver went into appreciable element about these claims, accusing the startup of offering clients with “fabricated proof of board conferences, checks, and processes that by no means occurred,” then forcing these clients to “select between adopting pretend proof or performing largely guide work with little actual automation or AI.”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
DeepDelver additionally claimed that nearly all of Delve’s shoppers appear to have gone via two audit corporations, Accorp and Gradient, which they described as “a part of the identical operation,” one which operates primarily in India, with solely a nominal presence in the USA.
These corporations, they stated, are simply rubber-stamping reviews that have been generated by Delve. Consequently, DeepDelver stated the startup “inverts” the traditional compliance construction: “By producing auditor conclusions, take a look at procedures, and closing reviews earlier than any impartial evaluate happens, Delve locations itself within the position of each implementer and examiner. This isn’t a technicality. It’s a structural fraud that invalidates your complete attestation.”
Along with accusing Delve of deceptive its clients, DeepDelver stated the startup helps these clients “mislead the general public by internet hosting belief pages that comprise safety measures that have been by no means applied.”
DeepDelver stated that whereas their firm was discussing its points with Delve, the startup “despatched us a number of packing containers of donuts already to maintain us pleased.” Nonetheless, DeepDelver’s employer supposedly unpublished its belief web page and now not depends on the startup for compliance.
Delve responded to the accusations by saying it doesn’t problem compliance reviews in any respect. As an alternative, it’s an “automation platform” that ingests details about compliance, then gives auditors with entry to that info.
“Last reviews and opinions are issued solely by impartial, licensed auditors, not Delve,” the corporate stated.
Delve additionally stated that its clients “can choose to work with an auditor of their selecting or choose to work with one from Delve’s community of impartial, accredited third-party audit corporations.” These auditors, the startup stated, are “established corporations used broadly throughout the business, together with by different compliance platforms.”
In response to the accusation that it’s offering clients with “pretend proof,” Delve countered that it’s merely providing “templates to assist groups doc their processes in accordance with compliance necessities, as do different compliance platforms.”
“Draft templates aren’t the identical as ‘pre-filled proof,” the corporate stated.
Delve added that it’s “actively investigating any leaks” and is “nonetheless reviewing the Substack.”
Following the preliminary Substack publish, an X consumer named James Zhou stated they have been in a position to acquire entry to delicate info from Delve corresponding to worker background checks and fairness vesting schedules. Dvuln founder Jamieson O’Reilly shared extra particulars from what O’Reilly stated was a dialog with Zhou about “a number of gaping safety holes in Delve’s exterior assault floor.”
TechCrunch despatched an electronic mail in search of further remark to the media contact handle listed on Delve’s web site. The e-mail bounced, however I subsequently obtained a calendar invite for a “Delve demo” later this week. TechCrunch has additionally reached out to DeepDelver for added remark.
This publish has been up to date with further details about purported safety vulnerabilities supplied by Jamieson O’Reilly, and extra particulars about Delve’s response to TechCrunch.
