I get it; it’s not a straightforward time for a legacy automaker to be promoting electrical automobiles, what with incentives being gutted and Chinese language automakers knocking on the door. However Honda is taking it to a different degree.
This week, Honda killed its paltry — and admittedly unpromising — EV applications. What little motivation Honda needed to compete within the EV enviornment is seemingly gone, and together with it, any likelihood of surviving the present wave of disruption that’s sweeping the business.
The corporate casts blame on U.S. tariffs and Chinese language competitors, two straightforward targets. But it surely by no means actually had a viable EV technique to start with.
Honda kicked issues off on Thursday by halting improvement of the electrical Acura RDX and the Honda 0 sedan and SUV, three fashions that have been the corporate’s first ground-up EVs — however about which little or no was shared with outsiders. It continued on Friday, with Automotive Information reporting that Honda was going to cease manufacturing of the Prologue, a automobile that was basically designed and completely constructed by GM.
The choice might backfire in numerous other ways, however there are two that I’d argue are most necessary. By shelving EVs, Honda will fall farther behind in two of the most important shifts sweeping the automotive business: electrical drivetrains and software-defined automobiles.
Missed EV alternatives
To Honda — and to many legacy automakers nonetheless early within the transition— an EV is only a automobile with a unique drivetrain. I can think about Honda executives considering that they’ll wait out the awkward transition interval and, when motors and batteries are absolutely sorted, merely swap out the fossil gas bits. How arduous might it’s?
That’s a mistake, in fact. Many automakers have discovered that dropping batteries right into a automobile initially designed for an inner combustion engine doesn’t work out so properly. It’d shortcut the event cycle, however the ensuing product finally ends up heavy, inefficient, and extra expensive to provide.
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
When developed as an authentic product, EVs provide automakers an opportunity to rethink the auto, and within the course of, make it cheaper.
Take Ford, for instance. The Mustang Mach E has been a gross sales success, however not a monetary one for Ford. The Mach E relies on a closely modified model of the platform that additionally underpins the Escape, a fossil gas crossover. A part of the issue, Ford CEO Chris Farley mentioned in a latest interview, was that legacy engineering selections held the product again: The Mach E’s wiring harness is 70 kilos heavier than Tesla’s, for instance. Small errors like that compound themselves in a product as complicated as an car.
Honda may also miss out on a number of studying alternatives. There’s studying by doing, each in improvement and manufacturing. There’s additionally studying to domesticate new suppliers and provide chains. It’ll additionally miss out on receiving important buyer suggestions — what do folks actually worth of their EVs?
Sayonara, software-defined automobiles
Right here, Honda is setting itself up for failure on the second disruption sweeping the automotive business: the software-defined automobile (SDV), which has core capabilities that may be upgraded and improved over time.
Shoppers, principally those that purchase EVs from the likes of Tesla, Rivian, and BYD, have grown accustomed to the frequent updates, slick infotainment software program, and superior driver help techniques of Tesla, Rivians, Nio or Xiaomi. Honda has but to make vital progress in any of these domains.
SDVs don’t need to be EVs, however they have an inclination to go hand-in-hand. The massive battery in an EV makes it simpler to feed highly effective computer systems, and it permits issues like over-the-air updates to occur when the automobile is parked and “off.” Might Honda make a fossil gas SDV? Certain, however it’s unlikely to for a similar motive it’s backing away from EVs: the previous approach of doing issues is less complicated and extra worthwhile, for now.
What does Honda stand for?
Honda is going through an id disaster. At its core, it’s an inner combustion engine firm. It makes actually good engines, and that’s beginning to matter much less and fewer.
Different traits of its automobiles are additionally beneath assault. For years, the corporate has prided itself on making driver’s automobiles. They’re light-weight, environment friendly, and deal with properly. However when the automobile drives itself, what does a “driver’s automobile” even imply?
Placing autonomy apart, I’d argue that the marketplace for a driver’s automobile is proscribed anyway. Persons are drawn to Honda as a result of they’re dependable and fairly priced. The truth that they deal with properly is icing on the cake, possibly serving to customers break a tie in the event that they’re torn between two manufacturers.
However EVs promise to be considerably extra dependable than fossil gas automobiles, and as Chinese language automakers present, as soon as battery costs come down, so do total automobile prices. If Honda can’t compete on reliability or value, customers will balk.
That already seems to be occurring in China. Honda mentioned as a lot in its latest earnings report. “Honda was unable to ship merchandise that provide worth for cash higher than that of newer EV producers, leading to a decline in competitiveness,” the corporate mentioned. Headwinds in China contributed to the corporate’s almost $16 billion losses final yr. And not using a plan for EVs, it’s solely a matter of time earlier than Honda suffers the identical destiny elsewhere.
